“Someone’s gotta win” – Massachusetts State Lottery Slogan, 2016
Traditional lotteries are run all over the world by countries, states, cities, and more. These lotteries are most often used to fund projects that the lottery agency wants to complete; whether that project will benefit the public or not is up for debate. There are many different lotteries that people can play, and they all share one thing in common: odds.
Odds are a funny thing. If you are playing a lottery where a certain number of tickets are sold, and one of those tickets will win for sure, your odds are based on the number of tickets sold. But modern lotteries have realized that there is a far more profitable method (profitable for them at least).
Take, for example, one of the standard lottery games that is played worldwide: 6/49. In this game, the player chooses 6 numbers out of 49 numbers (typically 1-49), and the numbers are then typically drawn out of a machine that contains balls with the corresponding numbers printed on them. Seems easy, right?
Well, there are a few things working against you here. First, statistics. The odds of choosing the correct six numbers (and these don’t even have to be in the correct order most of the time) is 1 in 13,983,816. Let’s give that number some perspective based on data for US citizens:
Have you ever thought to yourself “I have a good chance of dying from sunstroke?” Didn’t think so. Odds are funny, and when our emotions get involved we tend to skew them to make ourselves feel better. But by that logic, buying traditional lottery tickets (especially in the 6/49 game) should give us more fear of the sun than hope for winning.
High fees eat into lottery profits, the uncertainty of people cheating the lottery system, and costly operations. So, the most obvious solution here is the blockchain, right?
“Blockchain Fixes Everything” – Every blockchain writer ever
First, they address the problem of fraud by running the RNG through a hash that is based on a blockchain; this takes care of cheaters since the number is verifiably random.
Second, they give out more in winnings since they have far lower administrative and operational fees than traditional lotteries. For instance, both Quanta and Fire Lotto award lottery prizes containing 70% of the money raised through ticket sales.
Wait, that isn’t much better than the 63% that US lotteries offer on average. But, at least since they offer the ability for users to pay with cryptocurrency they are open to users around the world. Also, since these companies launched their own coins during their ICOs they give players a chance to reinvest their winnings back into the lottery in an effort to win more money before withdrawing, right? Well, technically yes, but it wouldn’t have been the best plan. When looking at total ROIs for each of these coins: FireLotto (-93.36%), Quanta (-51.72%).
It would seem that these blockchain lottery companies weren’t actually trying to create a fair lottery on the blockchain, instead they realized that creating a fair lottery on the blockchain was just an easy way to get rich through high fees (30% per lottery). They had no plans of keeping their coin stable. There is another option, though, and that’s using a blockchain to run a lottery while giving 100% of earnings to lottery players.
Their approach isn’t to charge an exorbitant fee for each lottery (honestly, taking 30% of the total winnings in a blockchain lottery is absurd), instead they will charge a 1% smart contract execution fee that is applied only post-game to the winnings, and a small (0.1%) transfer fee on their blockchain. Most of that 1% fee goes back into the YOUnited economy, which helps cover incentive programs that they run to entice new players to their games. We have constant examples in the blockchain world where a company tries to take too much, too fast, with too little regard for the community they serve. They seem to see the potential for long-term growth with their community and is working to create a sustainable community that will earn them smaller profits, but these profits will continue over a far longer period of time than companies that charge high fees and burn out fast. YOUnited definitely has better odds of success than Quanta and FireLotto, if only because they are looking to earn a steady income stream instead of striking it rich in one swift move.
Nevertheless, lotteries are a gamble, literally, and whether they are a waste of money is up to each individual person to decide for themselves. With a traditional lottery you are faced with absurd odds, long payout times, and a huge cut out of your winnings for taxes, fees, and more. Blockchain lotteries, however, can definitely fix these issues, but as with any type of gambling, be sure to research your options before diving in. Gamble safe, dear reader, and have fun out there.